Methodology

“AD Scientific Index” Methodology

1. What is the AD Scientific Index (Alper-Doger Scientific Index)?

Developed in 2021 by Prof. Dr. Murat Alper and Assoc. Prof. Dr. Cihan Döğer, the AD Scientific Index is an independent and international ranking system that provides a multidimensional evaluation of the academic performance of scientists and institutions. Key highlights include:

Original academic rankings, detailed analyses, and comparative results
A resource guiding policy development to enhance scientific contributions and productivity
Analysis of 2.626.060 scientists and 24.515 institutions across 13 major academic fields and 211 disciplines, covering 221 countries
Data sourced from Google Scholar and subjected to rigorous multi-stage filtering processes
Evaluation based on total and last six years’ H-index, i10-index, and citation counts. Rankings are updated every few days, offering near real-time accuracy that reflects current academic performance.

2. Why is the AD Scientific Index (Alper-Doger Scientific Index) Needed?

✅ Most international university rankings consider parameters like:

Research productivity, impact, excellence
Educational quality
Faculty quality
Research output
Per capita performance

✅ Many of these rely heavily on publication and citation counts as key indicators of academic performance. However, these methods:

Vary in data sources (e.g., SCIE, SSCI, InCites)
Differ in what types of publications they count (articles, notes, conference papers, etc.)
May emphasize high-impact journals (e.g., Nature, Science, PNAS)
Often use H-index, top 5% journals by impact factor, total citations, and other indicators
Frequently face redundancy (measuring the same aspect multiple times), leading to “indicator alignment”
Rarely exceed coverage of 1,500–3,000 institutions or 70–100 countries due to these limitations

✅ How AD Scientific Index Addresses These Gaps

Focuses on both total and six-year productivity (H-index, i10-index, citation data)
Ranks individual scientists as well as academic fields, institutions, and countries
Broad coverage spanning countries, regions, institutions, disciplines, languages, and publication types
Ensures equal opportunities for comparison with a fair and transparent methodology
No reliance on non-public or invisible parameters in ranking formulas.

3. What are the H-index and i10-index?

H-index: Evaluates both productivity and citation impact. An H-index of h means the researcher has h papers each cited at least h times.
i10-index (calculated by Google Scholar): Counts the number of publications with at least 10 citations.

These metrics:

Offer insight into consistent academic influence
Higher values indicate more sustained impact

4. The Importance of Last 6 Years Metrics

The AD Scientific Index places special emphasis on Last 6 Years metrics to reveal recent academic performance:

Total H-index, i10-index, citation count: Show long-term academic impact
Last 6 Years H-index, i10-index, citations: Highlight current contributions and relevance in evolving fields
Focuses on impact continuation over the last six years, not just publication dates
Ensures up-to-date perspective in identifying leading contributors and institutions

5. How Is the “AD Scientific Index” Different from Other Rankings?

✅ Multi-Dimensional Analysis

Comprehensive Metrics: Integrates total and last-six-year H-index, i10-index, and citation counts to provide a broad and balanced picture of academic impact.
Layered Comparisons: Enables evaluations at global, continental, national, and city levels, as well as public and private institutions, revealing both long-term influence and current momentum.

✅ Focus on Individual Scientists

Foundation of Institutional Success: Genuine breakthroughs and reputation stem from individual scientists.
Beyond Broad Factors: While other rankings often focus on “international reputation” or “teaching quality,” the AD Scientific Index homes in on concrete achievements, emphasizing the true drivers of institutional excellence.

✅ Accessible and Inclusive Data

Extensive Coverage: Utilizes publicly available Google Scholar data, carefully screened, to assess researchers across every field, country, and type of institution.

✅ Equal Opportunity

Fair Recognition: Offers equitable acknowledgment to all scientists and institutions, regardless of geographical or institutional background.
Seamless Participation: The system is easy to join on both individual and institutional levels, making academic performance visible at every tier, in near real time.

✅ Democratic and Universal Approach

Global Level Playing Field: Reflects how individual accomplishments shape the overall performance of institutions worldwide.
Commitment to Transparency: Employs impartial, reproducible methods, ensuring equal conditions for prominent research universities and smaller colleges alike.

✅ Identifying Misconduct

Guardian of Integrity: Acts as an early warning system against plagiarism, unethical authorship (e.g., gift authorship), or excessive publication practices.
Institutional and Individual Accountability: Ensures that authentic academic contributions remain in the spotlight by uncovering ethical violations, safeguarding the credibility of researchers and institutions.

6. Unique Features of the “AD Scientific Index”

✅ Academic and Economic Independence

Operates entirely free from external influences, ensuring that evaluations focus exclusively on academic merit.
Maintains objective and transparent standards without commercial or political pressure.

✅ Transparent and Rigorous Methodology

Relies on open-source, verifiable data combined with clearly defined algorithms and weighting.
Corrects errors within one week and strictly upholds impartiality to preserve credibility and accuracy.

✅ Comprehensive Evaluation

Provides both total and last-six-year metrics (H-index, i10-index, citations) for universities, institutions, hospitals, and companies.
Allows stakeholders to assess long-term trends alongside recent performance at a glance.

✅ Institutional Progress Analysis

Monitors and analyzes institutional development over the last six years, highlighting growth trajectories and performance shifts.

✅ Public vs. Private Comparison

Offers direct comparisons among public universities, as well as with private universities, companies, hospitals, and research institutes.
Illuminates sector-wide benchmarks for a broader context of academic achievement.

✅ Scientific Ranking Distribution

Examines academic staff rankings within each institution, showing percentile-based standings to pinpoint individual and collective strengths.

✅ Individual Status Tracking

Presents detailed profiles for researchers (H-index, i10-index, citations), delivering clear insights into each scholar’s impact and influence.

✅ Global and Regional Rankings

Encompasses 2.626.060 individuals from 24.515 institutions across 221 countries and 10 regions, covering a wide array of disciplines.
Enables branch- and sub-discipline-specific evaluations for targeted insights. individuals from institutions,

✅ Top List Reports

Generates country-level, regional, and global top lists, serving as valuable resources for benchmarking and recognition.

✅ Continuously Refreshed Rankings (Near Real-Time)

Ensures continuous data refresh, with H index, i10 index and citation metrics updated every 10-20 days and rankings recalculated every two days.
Offers users an up-to-date view of academic performance.

✅ Valuing Feedback and Contributions

Incorporates community input to refine the methodology and maintain data accuracy.
Facilitates a collaborative approach that keeps rankings current and reliable.

✅ Increased Visibility & Early Detection of Ethical Violations

Sheds light on unethical practices (e.g., gift authorship, citation cartels, fake paper factories), promoting academic integrity through transparency.
Helps identify and address potential misconduct promptly.

✅ Art and Humanities Rankings & Social Sciences and Humanities Rankings

Provides dedicated rankings that accurately represent these fields, leveraging Google Scholar’s broad coverage.
Ensures these disciplines receive fair, detailed visibility alongside STEM areas.

7. Comprehensive and Inclusive Data Source Strategy

Most ranking organizations use Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, or Nature Index. Each has strengths and limitations.

✅Our Approach:

Global, practical, inclusive methodology
Robust auditing to mitigate data source limitations
Continuous data cleansing (nearly 1 million profiles reviewed; many deleted)
Ongoing quality improvements ensure increasingly accurate and up-to-date rankings, approaching real-time accuracy.

8. How Frequently Are AD Scientific Index Rankings Updated?

New entries, deletions, corrections typically visible within 1–3 days
H-index, i10-index, and citation numbers are updated every 15 days, while the ranking is refreshed every 2 days.
Data primarily from Google Scholar with a focus on standardizing names, institutions, and data
User contributions to enhance data accuracy are always welcome

9. Who Can Be Included in the List and How Does the Inclusion Process Work?

AD Scientific Index currently includes data on 2.626.060 scientists from 24.515 institutions across 221 countries. While these figures represent one of the broadest samples available globally, we would like to emphasize that listing all researchers with a public Google Scholar profile is not our objective, and such profiles are not automatically included in the system.

The primary ways to be included are:

Paid Individual or Institutional Registration: Researchers and institutions who wish to ensure immediate inclusion may do so by registering through the “Register” link on our website.

We would like to kindly emphasize that automatically including all publicly available Google Scholar profiles is not part of our model, as it would compromise data quality and system sustainability. Maintaining the integrity of the index involves:

Multi-layered verification of data accuracy
Continuous updates to citation and index scores
Ethical checks
Monitoring of affiliation changes
Tracking of institutional mergers, closures, and renamings
Responsible handling of profiles of deceased individuals

Given these demands, we prioritize a manageable, meaningful, and accessible data structure over unlimited expansion. Our approach aims to provide equitable representation for countries and institutions worldwide within the boundaries of operational feasibility.

Additional reasons a profile may not appear or may be temporarily removed from the index include:

Hidden or Deleted Profiles: If a previously listed profile is hidden or deleted, the associated metrics (e.g., h-index, i10 index, citation count) may be shown as zero or removed. If the profile becomes public again and has not been permanently deleted, previous scores are automatically restored.
Ethical Considerations: In cases involving false authorship, retracted publications, citation manipulation, or fabricated content, profiles may be removed from the system—even if registered—without refund.
Voluntary Removal: We respect researchers' preferences and remove profiles upon request.

As a result, some researchers from a given institution may appear in the index while others do not. This outcome reflects the structure and practical boundaries of the system, and should not be perceived as a reflection of an individual’s academic qualifications.

Researchers and institutions who would like to increase their visibility are encouraged to explore our individual or institutional registration options based on their needs.

10. Is Registration Required to View Your Ranking?

Not required to see your ranking in the AD Scientific Index. You can estimate your approximate ranking by looking at the rankings of individuals with similar scores. Required if you wish to be included with all detailed elements in the ranking

11. How AD Scientific Index Ranks Scientists and Institutions?

✅ Key Indicators

Total H-index scores
Last 6 years’ H-index scores
Total i10 index scores
Last 6 years’ i10 index scores
Total number of citations
Number of citations in the last 6 years

Ranking Criteria – Overview
Scientist and institution rankings in the AD Scientific Index are calculated based on multiple bibliometric indicators, with Total H-index serving as the primary ranking metric in most categories. General, Country, Regional, University, Branch, and Sub-Branch Rankings.

✅ Total H-index Rankings
Used in: Measures cumulative scientific impact and productivity.
Ranking order:

Total H-index
Last 6 Years’ H-index
Total i10 Index
Total Citations

✅ Last 6 Years’ H-index Rankings
Measures short-to-mid-term academic performance and sustained impact.
Ranking order:

Last 6 Years’ H-index
Last 6 Years’ i10 Index
Total H-index
Citations in the Last 6 Years

✅ Total i10 Index Rankings
Measures: Reflects the consistency of influential scholarly output.
Ranking order:

Total i10 Index
Last 6 Years’ i10 Index
Total H-index
Total Citation Counts

✅ Last 6 Years’ i10 Index Rankings
Measures recent sustained academic productivity and recognition.
Ranking order:

Last 6 Years’ i10 Index
Last 6 Years’ H-index
Total i10 Index
Citations in the Last 6 Years

✅ Total Citations Rankings
Captures total scientific reach and academic recognition.
Ranking order:

Total Citation Counts
Citations in the Last 6 Years
Total i10 Index
Last 6 Years’ i10 Index

✅ Citations in the Last 6 Years Rankings
Indicates present-day influence and citation activity.
Ranking order:

Citations in the Last 6 Years
Total Citation Counts
Last 6 Years’ i10 Index
Total i10 Index

Institutions are also ranked by these criteria at national, regional, and global levels.

✅ Studies Influencing Ranking Due to High Citation Numbers

For unusually high citations (e.g., CERN, ATLAS, ALICE, CMS), authors are marked with an asterisk “i” to indicate this distinction.
An alternative list excludes these studies to ensure balanced rankings.

12. Why Are Last 6 Years' Ratios Important?

Reflect recent productivity and influence
Indicate impact of individual performance and institutional policies
Provide a clear view of modern academic contributions

13. Subject Rankings: Which Subjects are Ranked in the AD Scientific Index?

The Index covers 211 sub-disciplines across various major fields:

Agriculture & Forestry: 15 subfields
Architecture & Design: 4 subfields
Business & Management: 8 subfields
Economics & Econometrics: 6 subfields
Education: 11 subfields
Engineering & Technology: 26 subfields
History, Philosophy, Theology: 3 subfields
Law / Legal Studies: 12 subfields
Medical and Health Sciences: 80 subfields
Natural Sciences: 6 subfields
Social Sciences: 22 subfields
Social Sciences and Humanities: 50 subfields
Art and Humanities: 6 subfields

This meticulous categorization aligns with university departments, enabling precise analysis of academic impact.

14. How Universities Are Ranked in the AD Scientific Index?

Rankings are based on the distribution of scientists within top percentile ranges (top % 10, %20, %40, %60, % 80, 90% percentiles and total scientists).
If two institutions have the same number of scientists in a range, the next percentile range is considered.
If a tie persists, the institution with the higher total number of individual scientists ranks higher.
Covers 24.515 institutions across:
- Total H-index
- Last 6 Years H-index
- Total i10 index
- Last 6 Years i10 index
- Total citations
- Last 6 Years citations

This approach helps institutions assess strengths, identify areas for improvement, and supports cross-border transfer or graduation equivalency evaluations.

15. Young University/Institution Rankings

Focuses on institutions established within the last 30 years. The ranking is formed by applying the university ranking only among institutions established within the last 30 years. Demonstrates global standing of these “young” entities. Identifies strengths and weaknesses to shape future policies

16. Social Sciences and Humanities Rankings – The AD Scientific Index Advantage

✔ Exclusive Ranking for Social Sciences & Humanities – Covers fields such as Business & Management, Economics & Econometrics, Education, History, Philosophy, Theology, Law, and Social Sciences.
✔ No Overshadowing by STEM Fields – Medicine, Engineering, and Natural Sciences are excluded, ensuring that institutions and scholars in Social Sciences & Humanities receive a fair and unbiased evaluation.
✔ A Balanced and Unique Ranking Approach – Unlike traditional rankings dominated by STEM disciplines, this ranking highlights the real academic impact of Social Sciences & Humanities, ensuring that institutions and researchers in these fields get the visibility they deserve.
✔ Comprehensive Performance Metrics – Rankings are conducted at both institutional and individual levels, based on H-index, i10-index, and citation data, providing a data-driven and objective assessment of academic excellence.

✔ The AD Scientific Index Advantage: With regularly refreshed data, a transparent methodology, and a strong focus on academic impact, this ranking ensures that achievements in Social Sciences & Humanities are properly recognized.!

17. Art and Humanities Rankings

Specialized ranking for History, Philosophy, Theology, Linguistics and Literature, Archaeology, and Arts
Ensures achievements in arts and humanities are recognized
Provides balanced evaluation free from STEM dominance
Explorable at institutional and individual levels (H-index, i10 index, citations)

18. 360° Real-Time Institutional Analysis

Find out where your university stands in global rankings with real-time data and gain key insights. Compare your position, strengths, and weaknesses in real-time against 24.515 universities worldwide at city, national, regional, and global levels. Benchmark against similar institutions across 13 major fields. Identify the most suitable scholars for your strategic transfer goals with a data-driven approach, and gain a competitive edge. Start Exploring for Free & Gain Insights Now!

19. Pricing Policy

✅ Free Services

No charge for accessing individual and institutional rankings via the main category pages
Most comprehensive academic data (for individuals and institutions) is freely accessible on AD Scientific Index

✅ Premium Services

One-time fee (covering three years) for:
- More comprehensive analyses
- Ability to input and modify data on Scientist and Institution pages
- Full control over your academic profile
Differentiated pricing based on income levels of countries
Strict deletion policy for unethical or misleading profiles applies to all users (including paid)

We remain academically and economically independent, offering unbiased services to the academic community.

20. Privacy – Data Policy

We respect personal rights and data deletion requests.
Click here for more information on our privacy and data policies.

20. Contact

21. FAQ Frequently Asked Questions and Answer

360° Real-Time Institutional Analysis

Strategic Intelligence to Shape Your Academic Future

✅ Propel Your Institution to the Pinnacle of Global Academia

✅ Transform Your Academic Power — Stay Ahead of the Competition

Instantly see where your institution stands among 24.505 universities worldwide.
Gain strategic insights, enhance your rankings, and surpass competitors with real-time, data-driven decisions.

✅ Aligned with Global Higher Education Excellence Frameworks

Aligned with Global Higher Education Excellence Frameworks
Whether your institution seeks to excel under India's NIRF and NAAC, Brazil's CAPES, Mexico's CONACYT, the USA’s Carnegie Classification, the UK’s Research Excellence Framework (REF), Australia’s ERA, Japan&rsqu